After extensive research eight different individuals were discovered within the forty-five samples collected. Out of the forty-five samples fifteen of them did not have enough data to conclude if they belong to one of the other individuals or not. The individuals with not enough data are label in red below (Table 2). The other thirty samples break up into the eight different individuals (Table 3). These individuals could contain one sample (Individual 1, 2, 7, or 8 in Table 3) or sixteen samples (Individual 4 in Table 3) which were collected. The numbers are the size of the alleles in each of the samples (Table 2). There were three primers, ORMP-028, ORMP-016, and WMPS-20, which were able to be optimized. Those three primers were used to amplify different alleles in the sample. With the three primers amplifying the different alleles it was determined by the samples which contained the same allele was either the same individual or related. On all of the inconclusive samples, the WMPS-20 primer did not work. Since the primer did not work, the samples did not have enough data, and this is why the fifteen samples were inconclusive. Assumptions were made when determining if the individuals were related or not. This is shown by a phylogenetic tree, which was shown for this purpose (Figure 2).